What is wrong with Canute in Vikings?
The television series “Vikings” has captivated audiences with its portrayal of the lives of legendary Norse warriors and explorers. However, the depiction of Canute the Great, one of the most prominent figures in Viking history, has been met with criticism and debate. This article aims to explore the discrepancies and inaccuracies in the portrayal of Canute in “Vikings” and shed light on what is wrong with this depiction.
In the first season of “Vikings,” Canute is introduced as a young and ambitious prince who aspires to become a great king. While the series does capture his ambition and desire for power, it fails to accurately represent his character and achievements. One of the primary issues with the portrayal of Canute in “Vikings” is the romanticization of his character.
The series depicts Canute as a charismatic and charismatic leader who is able to unite the Danes and Norwegians under his rule. However, historical records suggest that Canute’s rise to power was not as smooth as the series portrays. He faced numerous challenges and had to navigate complex political landscapes to establish his authority. The series also fails to highlight the harsh realities of Viking life, such as the constant threat of war and the harsh conditions they had to endure.
Another significant flaw in the portrayal of Canute in “Vikings” is the downplaying of his military campaigns. The series focuses more on his personal life and relationships, rather than his military achievements. Canute was a formidable military leader who expanded his kingdom through conquests and alliances. He was known for his strategic brilliance and ability to adapt to different situations. The series, however, fails to capture these aspects of his character.
Moreover, the series inaccurately portrays Canute’s relationship with his son, Sweyn Forkbeard. In the show, Sweyn is depicted as a loyal and devoted son who supports his father’s ambitions. In reality, Sweyn was a skilled and ambitious ruler in his own right, who eventually challenged his father’s authority. The series fails to explore the complex dynamics between Canute and Sweyn, which played a crucial role in shaping the future of Denmark.
The portrayal of Canute’s relationship with his queen, Emma of Normandy, is also problematic. In “Vikings,” Emma is depicted as a strong-willed and influential queen who supports her husband’s ambitions. However, historical records suggest that Emma’s influence on Canute was limited, and she was more of a political pawn than a driving force behind her husband’s decisions. The series overemphasizes her role, which is not supported by historical evidence.
In conclusion, “Vikings” fails to accurately portray Canute the Great, one of the most significant figures in Viking history. The series romanticizes his character, downplays his military campaigns, and inaccurately represents his relationships with his family. While “Vikings” is an entertaining show, it is important for viewers to approach it with a critical eye and seek out historical sources to gain a more accurate understanding of Canute’s life and legacy. What is wrong with Canute in “Vikings” is the lack of historical accuracy and the overemphasis on his personal life, at the expense of his political and military achievements.
